The First Tour de France Kindle Ö Tour de PDF/EPUB

The First Tour de France Kindle Ö Tour de PDF/EPUB


The First Tour de France ❰Reading❯ ➶ The First Tour de France Author Peter Cossins – Capitalsoftworks.co.uk From its inception the 1903 Tour de France was a colorful affair Full of adventure mishaps and audacious attempts at cheating it was a race to be remembered Cyclists of the time weren't enthusiastic a From its inception Tour de PDF/EPUB ½ the Tour de France was a colorful affair Full of adventure mishaps and audacious attempts at cheating it was a race to be remembered Cyclists of the time weren't enthusiastic about The First Kindle - participating in this heroic race on roads suited to hooves than wheels with bikes weighing up to thirty five pounds on a single fixed gear for three full weeks Assembling enough riders for the race meant First Tour de PDF/EPUB ´ paying unemployed amateurs from the suburbs of Paris including a butcher a chimney sweep and a circus acrobat From Maurice The White Bulldog Garin an Italian born Frenchman whose parents were said to have swapped him for a round of cheese in order to smuggle him into France as a fourteen year old to Hippolyte Aucouturier who looked like a villain from a Buster Keaton movie with his jersey of horizontal stripes and handlebar moustache the cyclists were a remarkable bunch Starting in the Parisian suburb of Montgeron the route took the intrepid cyclists through Lyon over the hills to Marseille then on to Toulouse Bordeaux and Nantes ending with great fanfare at the Parc des Princes in Paris There was no indication that this ramshackle cycling pack would draw crowds to throng France's rutted roads and cheer the first Tour heroes But they did; and all thanks to a marketing ruse cycling would never be the same again.

  • Audiobook
  • The First Tour de France
  • Peter Cossins
  • 25 October 2014
  • 9781478975205

10 thoughts on “The First Tour de France

  1. Emesskay Emesskay says:

    I was reading this book as the 2017 Tour de France was happening It was interesting to look at the contrast between the first riders of the event their bikes were heavy they wore wool or cotton clothing they rode ridiculous distances stages typically between 400 and 500 KM they rode day and night with no lighting on mostly dirt roads and contrast it today's riders in their Lycra skinsuits and their super lightweight bikes riding shorter distances on paved roads Before I read this book I did not realize that in the early days of bicycling the only way to change the gear was to change the back wheel so the bikers competing in the first Tour generally chose the gear they wanted to ride in and rode that one gear for the whole stage It does make you wonder how Chris Froome or Lance Armstrong would have done on that first Tour with similar euipment and no support from a teamThis books brings to light and puts into perspective how the most iconic bike race came to be and the hardy souls who undertook such an arduous and crazy task It also shows how the Tour had many effects besides being an awesome sporting spectacle it helped popularize bicycling it helped bring the country of France together it helped a nation feel proud of itselfThe story of the Tour is told in alternating seuence of events surrounding the Tour and reporting on each stage as if we were reading a contemporary newspaper account of the the race The author has obviously done extensive research into the topic his thorough knowledge really showsSome history books are informative and dull this is NOT one of those types It is a history book that is easy and enjoyable to read I learned a lot from it and as a result have great admiration for all the riders that too part in the first Tour de France You do not have to be a history buff to enjoy this book it is a great story well toldI received an advance readers copy through a Goodreads giveaway I know the ARCs differ from the formally published items One thing I wished the ARC had was some maps as an American a bit shaky on the geography of France I had trouble envisioning the various stages It may be the formally published edition has maps and if so that is a great addition the book is still enjoyable without maps I just had to put it down to look things upHighly recommend this book for fans of history fans of cycling and fans of the Tour de France

  2. Nick Penzenstadler Nick Penzenstadler says:

    A must read for Tour fans Probably a little heftier than needed but good details from the event that started everything Vive le Tour

  3. John Vanderslice John Vanderslice says:

    This is a wonderful book While I follow the Tour every year and thus am a natural audience for this book I think even a casual observer of the tour can enjoy it It’s impeccably researched by the author Peter Cossins and written in an extremely approachable manner Cossins provides a great deal of background context to the tour and to the men who dreamed it up Also to the phenomenon of bike racing But maybe most notably he narrates each of the six stages of that first tour like it’s an event unfolding right before you Very dramatic very engaging And it’s not just athletic feats he’s narrating but also occasions of cheating road disasters injuries spectator enthusiasm the rush of riders to reach the reuired sign in sheets at designated stops during each stage the infighting and hard feelings between some of them In these chapters Cossins takes a wide variety of different accounts from the period and synthesizes them into smooth exciting present tense narratives I also appreciate the information he provides about what happened in the careers of the finishers in the years following that first tour of 1903 What comes through loud and clear both explicitly and implicitly is how the very first Tour de France became a kind of template for the entire future life of this most important of bicycle races In both good ways and bad And the reader can’t help but marvel at how—during an era of comparatively primitive bicycle technology and little to no understanding of training nutrition etc—the finishers of 1903 were not only able to complete a gargantuan course one that almost managed to encapsulate the whole country but in many cases at remarkable speeds It boggles the mind

  4. Judith Siers-Poisson Judith Siers-Poisson says:

    I am not a fan of the Tour de France but I loved this book Cossins does an excellent job of placing the race in the cultural economic and social context of Belle Epoue France as well as making the characters both on and off the route memorable and intriguing A really fun and interesting read

  5. Michael Michael says:

    I found this on the new book shelf at the public library To me the dust cover design didn't much suggest a newly published book and I have read enough books with a Tour de France theme that I took this home thinking I would give it 25 pages with the expectation that it wouldn't engage my attentionBut it did this focused look at the first instance of the Tour de France and how it came to happen drew me in A good book about professional bicycle racing successfully combines description of the context of the race enough but not too much about the significant riders and a narrative description of the race itself and that's what is I found hereFrom reading this and having read other books about the Tour I came away with a better understanding of just how much the structure and rules of the Tour de France have changed over the years since the first iteration in 1903Two aspects of the 1903 Tour de France surprised me One was that the new rule at the time for the race that forbid what was called pacing that is riders that were only part of the race to lead a designated team leader who would draft behind them Of course riders did draft behind one another but usually taking turns to help each other and not in support of one person The no pacing rule was in fact about leveling the field between teams with money to have riders and other smaller effortsAnother was the structure of the race overall which was uite different than recent years although it ran over 19 days as a multi stage race there were only six stages with longer periods for rest between stages that were on average far longer than what is done today Some amazingly given the lack of lighting on the route or available to cyclists in the form of headlights the stages would usually start in the middle of the night and run through the day with some riders continuing on into the next night Given the road conditions and the length of the stages the physical demands of simply completing a stage must have been incredibleAn enjoyable and entertaining read

  6. Tony Zale Tony Zale says:

    Professional cycling's premier event is the Tour de France and The First Tour de France provides a comprehensive look at turn of the century biking and the birth of the race Though the modern bicycle was still relatively new there were already a million bikes in France by the early 20th century and racing was a popular public entertainment Spectators crowded stands to watch track racing and lined the roads for point to point races The Tour aspired to be than just another race though Newspaper editor Henri Desgrange envisioned it as a means of boosting French patriotism and highlighting the physical prowess of its citizenry; in his opinion the country was still stinging from losing a war to Prussia 30 years earlier Desgrange's secondary motivation was to boost the sales of his struggling paper establishing the connection between professional cycling and commerce that still exists today The race's multi day tour format was innovative and designed to be a spectacle The first uarter of the book covers its initial conception and organization and is a little slow The actual race description fills most the rest and has a surprising level of detailThere's enough entertaining visual imagery that I could imagine a screen adaptation being enjoyable and possibly engaging than the book The riders completed an amazing physical feat with many stages longer than what riders take on today yet the science of the race was still completely undeveloped We hear of riders slurping broth and eating whole chickens midrace drinking alcohol and consuming potent intoxicants for pain relief wrestling to the front of the sign in stations set up midstage and laying down on the side of the road for a midrace nap There are enough hijinks to suggest that the riders might be part of the Busytown universe One racer habitually twirls his moustache while another threatens competitors with physical violence Cheating runs rampant despite the supposed threat of undercover race judges lurking on the course Bike manufacturers sponsoring riders already exert influence over the outcome of the race Spectators crowd starting and ending checkpoints on the race despite the fact that they will only see the riders for a minute or twoAll that said I couldn't really recommend the book to someone uninterested in the world of bike racing The details are descriptive and interesting but it doesn't uite transcend the subject material

  7. Eli Eli says:

    I received this book for free through this site's giveaway programCall it 35 stars rounded down to 3 on account of the writing This book is good in a lot of ways but the writing from the level of individual words up through sentences paragraphs and chapters leaves something to be desired In particular aside from the things that are fundamentally stylistic I think that the book suffered somewhat from not having a clear focus or thread to tie it together The chapters roughly alternate between a description of a stage and a description of some other element of the race which is an okay structure to use but not a great one but the bigger problem is that each individual chapter just feels disorganized Cossins seems to want to include big picture political concerns alongside bar trivia factoids biographies alongside economics lessons and so on but there's only so much that I can take at any given moment To me this book felt like the reading euivalent of channel surfing you'll catch some good glimpses of things but you'll also kinda have a headache after a whileOn the upside I feel like I learned a lot from this book and despite its flawed prose I'd recommend it even to people who are only casually interested in the subject Again it's not the most pitch perfect thing you'll ever read but the information is good I do feel like Cossins reached a few times in some of his conclusions and so perhaps it would've been helpful for him to provide specific citations instead of just a general bibliography which is not something I ever thought I'd say but overall he seems like a reliably guy and the book seems like a reliable book And I guess that there's a silver lining with respect to his inability to stick to a single topic or theme which is that there's probably something in here for many audiencesBasically on the whole I'm pleased to have read this book and I think other people will be as well but I sure wish that Cossins's editor had put the clamps on him a little

  8. Peter Peter says:

    Historian Peter Cossins’ book The First Tour De France is the story of 1903’s first version of that Sporting Event Cossins according to Penguin Publishing’s website has been writing about cycling since 1993 In an interview with Feargal McKay of Sports Blog Nation from July of 2017 Cossins says he was struck when researching for The First Tour De France even through “race may have been 114 years ago and can seem like ancient history but in many ways it was the same race then as it is now” I agree with the Goodreads reviewer Nick Penzenstadler that The First Tour De France is “probably a little heftier than needed” In some way the most impressive part of The First Tour De France is how the competitors rode early 1900s' bicycles around France on roads that were not made for bicycles or cars sometimes into a strong wind or up inclines Mountain stages were not added to the Tour De France until the 1905 Tour Oftentimes the riders rode at night To uote Cossins on the beginning of stage 3 between Marseille and Toulouse “despite the wind drilling into their the cyclist’s faces they are as keen to get going as they were on the first two stages Within a few seconds and despite the full moon the night has consumed them”

  9. David Campbell David Campbell says:

    British freelance cycling journalist Peter Cossins’s nuts and bolts history of the inaugural 1903 Tour de France and its national and international contexts The concept for first Tour emerges along the uniuely French borderline between creativity and wackiness as cyclist turned editor prick Henri Desgrange gambles the future of his failing newspaper ‘L’Auto’ by promotingcovering a bike race so massive in scope it was initially assumed impossible to finish Three weeks and 1500 miles after leaving Paris in total obscurity however 21 riders actually DO finish before a crowd of 15000 The readership of ‘L’Auto’ is uadrupled and Le Tour makes it’s “Grand Départ” onto the modern sports landscape

  10. JBP JBP says:

    The main thing I learned about cycling in general after reading this book about the creation of the Tour de France and running its first race in 1903? Cyclists have been cheating and bending the rules since day one The doping they get busted for now? Just one form of them trying to get around the rules The other thing that struct me was what an absolute ordeal it was for these early racers with low tech bikes terrible roads zero emphasis on training and nutrition These guys were tough as nails that's for sure

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

10 thoughts on “The First Tour de France

  1. Emesskay Emesskay says:

    I was reading this book as the 2017 Tour de France was happening It was interesting to look at the contrast between the first riders of the event their bikes were heavy they wore wool or cotton clothing they rode ridiculous distances stages typically between 400 and 500 KM they rode day and night with no lighting on mostly dirt roads and contrast it today's riders in their Lycra skinsuits and their super lightweight bikes riding shorter distances on paved roads Before I read this book I did not realize that in the early days of bicycling the only way to change the gear was to change the back wheel so the bikers competing in the first Tour generally chose the gear they wanted to ride in and rode that one gear for the whole stage It does make you wonder how Chris Froome or Lance Armstrong would have done on that first Tour with similar euipment and no support from a teamThis books brings to light and puts into perspective how the most iconic bike race came to be and the hardy souls who undertook such an arduous and crazy task It also shows how the Tour had many effects besides being an awesome sporting spectacle it helped popularize bicycling it helped bring the country of France together it helped a nation feel proud of itselfThe story of the Tour is told in alternating seuence of events surrounding the Tour and reporting on each stage as if we were reading a contemporary newspaper account of the the race The author has obviously done extensive research into the topic his thorough knowledge really showsSome history books are informative and dull this is NOT one of those types It is a history book that is easy and enjoyable to read I learned a lot from it and as a result have great admiration for all the riders that too part in the first Tour de France You do not have to be a history buff to enjoy this book it is a great story well toldI received an advance readers copy through a Goodreads giveaway I know the ARCs differ from the formally published items One thing I wished the ARC had was some maps as an American a bit shaky on the geography of France I had trouble envisioning the various stages It may be the formally published edition has maps and if so that is a great addition the book is still enjoyable without maps I just had to put it down to look things upHighly recommend this book for fans of history fans of cycling and fans of the Tour de France

  2. Nick Penzenstadler Nick Penzenstadler says:

    A must read for Tour fans Probably a little heftier than needed but good details from the event that started everything Vive le Tour

  3. John Vanderslice John Vanderslice says:

    This is a wonderful book While I follow the Tour every year and thus am a natural audience for this book I think even a casual observer of the tour can enjoy it It’s impeccably researched by the author Peter Cossins and written in an extremely approachable manner Cossins provides a great deal of background context to the tour and to the men who dreamed it up Also to the phenomenon of bike racing But maybe most notably he narrates each of the six stages of that first tour like it’s an event unfolding right before you Very dramatic very engaging And it’s not just athletic feats he’s narrating but also occasions of cheating road disasters injuries spectator enthusiasm the rush of riders to reach the reuired sign in sheets at designated stops during each stage the infighting and hard feelings between some of them In these chapters Cossins takes a wide variety of different accounts from the period and synthesizes them into smooth exciting present tense narratives I also appreciate the information he provides about what happened in the careers of the finishers in the years following that first tour of 1903 What comes through loud and clear both explicitly and implicitly is how the very first Tour de France became a kind of template for the entire future life of this most important of bicycle races In both good ways and bad And the reader can’t help but marvel at how—during an era of comparatively primitive bicycle technology and little to no understanding of training nutrition etc—the finishers of 1903 were not only able to complete a gargantuan course one that almost managed to encapsulate the whole country but in many cases at remarkable speeds It boggles the mind

  4. Judith Siers-Poisson Judith Siers-Poisson says:

    I am not a fan of the Tour de France but I loved this book Cossins does an excellent job of placing the race in the cultural economic and social context of Belle Epoue France as well as making the characters both on and off the route memorable and intriguing A really fun and interesting read

  5. Michael Michael says:

    I found this on the new book shelf at the public library To me the dust cover design didn't much suggest a newly published book and I have read enough books with a Tour de France theme that I took this home thinking I would give it 25 pages with the expectation that it wouldn't engage my attentionBut it did this focused look at the first instance of the Tour de France and how it came to happen drew me in A good book about professional bicycle racing successfully combines description of the context of the race enough but not too much about the significant riders and a narrative description of the race itself and that's what is I found hereFrom reading this and having read other books about the Tour I came away with a better understanding of just how much the structure and rules of the Tour de France have changed over the years since the first iteration in 1903Two aspects of the 1903 Tour de France surprised me One was that the new rule at the time for the race that forbid what was called pacing that is riders that were only part of the race to lead a designated team leader who would draft behind them Of course riders did draft behind one another but usually taking turns to help each other and not in support of one person The no pacing rule was in fact about leveling the field between teams with money to have riders and other smaller effortsAnother was the structure of the race overall which was uite different than recent years although it ran over 19 days as a multi stage race there were only six stages with longer periods for rest between stages that were on average far longer than what is done today Some amazingly given the lack of lighting on the route or available to cyclists in the form of headlights the stages would usually start in the middle of the night and run through the day with some riders continuing on into the next night Given the road conditions and the length of the stages the physical demands of simply completing a stage must have been incredibleAn enjoyable and entertaining read

  6. Tony Zale Tony Zale says:

    Professional cycling's premier event is the Tour de France and The First Tour de France provides a comprehensive look at turn of the century biking and the birth of the race Though the modern bicycle was still relatively new there were already a million bikes in France by the early 20th century and racing was a popular public entertainment Spectators crowded stands to watch track racing and lined the roads for point to point races The Tour aspired to be than just another race though Newspaper editor Henri Desgrange envisioned it as a means of boosting French patriotism and highlighting the physical prowess of its citizenry; in his opinion the country was still stinging from losing a war to Prussia 30 years earlier Desgrange's secondary motivation was to boost the sales of his struggling paper establishing the connection between professional cycling and commerce that still exists today The race's multi day tour format was innovative and designed to be a spectacle The first uarter of the book covers its initial conception and organization and is a little slow The actual race description fills most the rest and has a surprising level of detailThere's enough entertaining visual imagery that I could imagine a screen adaptation being enjoyable and possibly engaging than the book The riders completed an amazing physical feat with many stages longer than what riders take on today yet the science of the race was still completely undeveloped We hear of riders slurping broth and eating whole chickens midrace drinking alcohol and consuming potent intoxicants for pain relief wrestling to the front of the sign in stations set up midstage and laying down on the side of the road for a midrace nap There are enough hijinks to suggest that the riders might be part of the Busytown universe One racer habitually twirls his moustache while another threatens competitors with physical violence Cheating runs rampant despite the supposed threat of undercover race judges lurking on the course Bike manufacturers sponsoring riders already exert influence over the outcome of the race Spectators crowd starting and ending checkpoints on the race despite the fact that they will only see the riders for a minute or twoAll that said I couldn't really recommend the book to someone uninterested in the world of bike racing The details are descriptive and interesting but it doesn't uite transcend the subject material

  7. Eli Eli says:

    I received this book for free through this site's giveaway programCall it 35 stars rounded down to 3 on account of the writing This book is good in a lot of ways but the writing from the level of individual words up through sentences paragraphs and chapters leaves something to be desired In particular aside from the things that are fundamentally stylistic I think that the book suffered somewhat from not having a clear focus or thread to tie it together The chapters roughly alternate between a description of a stage and a description of some other element of the race which is an okay structure to use but not a great one but the bigger problem is that each individual chapter just feels disorganized Cossins seems to want to include big picture political concerns alongside bar trivia factoids biographies alongside economics lessons and so on but there's only so much that I can take at any given moment To me this book felt like the reading euivalent of channel surfing you'll catch some good glimpses of things but you'll also kinda have a headache after a whileOn the upside I feel like I learned a lot from this book and despite its flawed prose I'd recommend it even to people who are only casually interested in the subject Again it's not the most pitch perfect thing you'll ever read but the information is good I do feel like Cossins reached a few times in some of his conclusions and so perhaps it would've been helpful for him to provide specific citations instead of just a general bibliography which is not something I ever thought I'd say but overall he seems like a reliably guy and the book seems like a reliable book And I guess that there's a silver lining with respect to his inability to stick to a single topic or theme which is that there's probably something in here for many audiencesBasically on the whole I'm pleased to have read this book and I think other people will be as well but I sure wish that Cossins's editor had put the clamps on him a little

  8. Peter Peter says:

    Historian Peter Cossins’ book The First Tour De France is the story of 1903’s first version of that Sporting Event Cossins according to Penguin Publishing’s website has been writing about cycling since 1993 In an interview with Feargal McKay of Sports Blog Nation from July of 2017 Cossins says he was struck when researching for The First Tour De France even through “race may have been 114 years ago and can seem like ancient history but in many ways it was the same race then as it is now” I agree with the Goodreads reviewer Nick Penzenstadler that The First Tour De France is “probably a little heftier than needed” In some way the most impressive part of The First Tour De France is how the competitors rode early 1900s' bicycles around France on roads that were not made for bicycles or cars sometimes into a strong wind or up inclines Mountain stages were not added to the Tour De France until the 1905 Tour Oftentimes the riders rode at night To uote Cossins on the beginning of stage 3 between Marseille and Toulouse “despite the wind drilling into their the cyclist’s faces they are as keen to get going as they were on the first two stages Within a few seconds and despite the full moon the night has consumed them”

  9. David Campbell David Campbell says:

    British freelance cycling journalist Peter Cossins’s nuts and bolts history of the inaugural 1903 Tour de France and its national and international contexts The concept for first Tour emerges along the uniuely French borderline between creativity and wackiness as cyclist turned editor prick Henri Desgrange gambles the future of his failing newspaper ‘L’Auto’ by promotingcovering a bike race so massive in scope it was initially assumed impossible to finish Three weeks and 1500 miles after leaving Paris in total obscurity however 21 riders actually DO finish before a crowd of 15000 The readership of ‘L’Auto’ is uadrupled and Le Tour makes it’s “Grand Départ” onto the modern sports landscape

  10. JBP JBP says:

    The main thing I learned about cycling in general after reading this book about the creation of the Tour de France and running its first race in 1903? Cyclists have been cheating and bending the rules since day one The doping they get busted for now? Just one form of them trying to get around the rules The other thing that struct me was what an absolute ordeal it was for these early racers with low tech bikes terrible roads zero emphasis on training and nutrition These guys were tough as nails that's for sure

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *